|
7
l June 30th, 2004: addressed to Cralg J. Canada. Do you recall
2 receiving that letter from the Department of Fair Employment
3 and Housing?
4 A. Yes, and another one.
5 Q. I'm sorry.
6 A. And another one.
7 Q. What did the other one say?
8 A. There's a phrase missing that I did not see there.
9 What they said was I could not connect my complaint to a
10 protected class is what they said. Or that I did not do you
11 us it is what they said. I disagree with them.
12 Q. Do you have a copy of that letter?
13 A. It's in my backpack.
14 Q. Am I correct that this letter says you have no
15 probable cause to prove a violation against Ms. Millard for
16 discrimination?
17 MR. MOORE: Objection to the extent it calls for
18 legal analysis or opinion. The document speaks for itself.
19 THE COURT: The documents speaks for itself. I'11
20 receive it into evidence.
21 (Plaintiff's Exhibit 4 was
22 received into evidence.)
23 MS. ROMANO: Thank you. Then I'd like to move to
24 admit plaintiff's.
25 THE COURT: It's already been received.
26 MS. ROMANO: Okay. Thank you.
27 THE COURT: Over objection.
28 Q. (BY MS. ROMANO) Mr. Canada, in with your
|
|
page:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
«prev»
«next»
cover i,
cover ii,
witnesses,
exhibits,
reporter's certificate,
clerk's certificate
|
|
|